Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Articles & Updates
From the Chamber

Articles & Legal Updates

Notes on procedure and practice before the Delhi courts, written for people trying to understand a proceeding they are already in.

These notes are written for litigants and for younger members of the Bar. They explain procedure as it operates in the Delhi courts — the sequence of steps, the timelines that matter, and the points at which a matter is commonly lost. They are general information, not advice on any particular case.

All articles (867) Civil & Property (45) Commercial (1) Commercial & Corporate (204) Criminal Law (309) Cyber & Fraud (5) Matrimonial & Family (223) Procedure & Practice (80)
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Only "Tainted" Consent Makes It an Offence: Delhi High Court on False Promise of Marriage

Granting bail in Vimal v. State NCT of Delhi, Justice Girish Kathpalia held that a consensual relationship becomes an offence only where consent was genuinely induced by a false assurance of marriage — and examined the timeline of the relationship to test that claim.

Read →
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Cancellation of Bail: Section 483(3) BNSS (formerly 439(2) CrPC)

The statutory power of the High Court and Court of Session to direct that a person released on bail be arrested, and how that power is invoked in practice.

Read →
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Anticipatory Bail at the Chargesheet Stage: How the Position Changes

The text of Section 482 BNSS contains no stage bar, but once a chargesheet is filed the practical options and the framing of the apprehension change.

Read →
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

How an Anticipatory Bail Application Proceeds in Delhi

From choosing the forum under Section 482 BNSS to interim protection, the status report, conditions and the furnishing of bonds.

Read →
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

The Presumptions in POCSO: Sections 29 and 30

What the two presumption provisions of the POCSO Act actually say, when they begin to operate, and what a rebuttable presumption means for the defence.

Read →
22 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Age Determination in POCSO Cases: Section 94 of the JJ Act

Why age is the threshold question in every POCSO case, the graded statutory scheme for proving it, and how a claim of juvenility by an accused is dealt with.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

The UP Gangsters Act Is “Stillborn”: It Punishes Without Creating an Offence

In Shiv Pratap Singh v. State of U.P., 2026 INSC 894, the Supreme Court holds that the UP Gangsters Act defines a gangster and prescribes punishment but never creates an offence, and quashes gang-chart prosecutions against two advocates.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Caste Abuse Inside an Enclosed Room Is Not “Within Public View”: Supreme Court

In Ramkrishna Chauhan v. State of U.P., 2026 INSC 895, the Supreme Court quashes charges under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST Act where the alleged insult occurred in a closed school office, while the IPC prosecution continues.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Rejection of a 156(3) Application Does Not Bar a Later FIR: Supreme Court

In Pramod Kumar Shukla v. State of U.P., 2026 INSC 887, the Supreme Court holds that a Magistrate’s threshold refusal to direct investigation is not res judicata against the police’s independent duty to register an FIR.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

POCSO Does Not Bar Cross-Examining a Child — It Regulates How: Delhi High Court

In Shankar Singh v. State, CRL.A. 662/2025, the Delhi High Court holds that Section 33 POCSO requires defence questions to be put to the child through the Special Court — not shut out — while upholding the conviction on the evidence.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Interim Bail: Short-Term Liberty While the Main Application Is Decided

How Delhi courts grant time-bound release pending the regular bail decision or for medical and family emergencies — the grounds, the conditions, and the consequences of not surrendering.

Read →
21 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Bail Conditions: What Courts May Impose, and Where the Limits Lie

Conditions under Section 480(3) BNSS must secure attendance and protect the investigation — not punish. Cash deposits, onerous sureties and unrelated conditions, and how to seek modification.

Read →
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 309 articles

What Is Covered Here

The chamber writes on the areas in which it appears: criminal procedure under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, bail practice, matrimonial and family proceedings before the Delhi Family Courts, cheque dishonour and recovery, and proceedings before the NCLT and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. Notes on reported judgments of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi are published with a link to the official text of the decision, so that a reader can verify the position rather than rely on a summary.

No article on this page identifies a client or discusses a pending matter conducted by the chamber. Where a statutory provision is cited, the section number is given so that a reader can verify it against the bare Act.

If a subject you need is not covered here, the chamber can be written to at legal@advocatemanishjha.com. Questions of general interest are taken up as future notes; the chamber does not give advice on individual matters by email.