Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Articles & Updates
From the Chamber

Articles & Legal Updates

Notes on procedure and practice before the Delhi courts, written for people trying to understand a proceeding they are already in.

These notes are written for litigants and for younger members of the Bar. They explain procedure as it operates in the Delhi courts — the sequence of steps, the timelines that matter, and the points at which a matter is commonly lost. They are general information, not advice on any particular case.

All articles (64) Civil & Property (10) Commercial (1) Commercial & Corporate (9) Criminal Law (29) Cyber & Fraud (1) Matrimonial & Family (8) Procedure & Practice (6)
4 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Section 498A and Live-In Relationships – Advocate Manish Jha

In Dr Lokesh B.H. v. State of Karnataka (3 August 2026), the Supreme Court holds that Section 498A IPC extends to live-in relationships in the nature of marriage between consenting adults, while mandating strict Arnesh Kumar safeguards.

Read →
4 August 2026 · Civil & Property

Accident Compensation for Child Victims – Advocate Manish Jha

The Supreme Court enhances a paraplegic child's motor accident award to Rs. 83.38 lakh, holding that functional disability, skilled-worker notional income and the multiplier of 18 govern claims for catastrophically injured children.

Read →
4 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

Adultery Plea at Interim Maintenance Stage – Advocate Manish Jha

In Himanshu Chordia v. State of Rajasthan (31 July 2026), the Supreme Court holds that a Section 125(4) CrPC plea of adultery must be examined at the interim maintenance stage where the material ex facie establishes the disqualification.

Read →
4 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Evidence Against an Absconder: SC Limits – Advocate Manish Jha

Acquitting a man convicted of a 1999 murder, the Supreme Court holds that a deposition recorded in an absconder's absence is inadmissible against him unless a formal Section 299 CrPC order was passed at the time.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Cyber & Fraud

Suspicion Is Not Reason to Believe: PMLA Freezing

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Enforcement Directorate's challenge to a Delhi High Court judgment holding that bank accounts cannot be frozen under the PMLA on mere suspicion, without the recorded reason to believe the statute requires.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Civil & Property

Reach Stacker Is Not a Motor Vehicle: MACT Limits

A reach stacker operating inside the custom-bonded Inland Container Depot at Tughlakabad is not a motor vehicle and depot roads are not a public place, the Supreme Court has held, restoring the Delhi MACT's rejection of the claim.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Limits on Quashing an FIR: Supreme Court – Advocate Manish Jha

Restoring quashed corruption FIRs in State of Karnataka v. Prabhu Shankar (30 July 2026), the Supreme Court reiterates that a High Court cannot conduct a mini-trial at the threshold: the only question is whether the FIR prima facie discloses a cognizable offence.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Civil & Property

Property in a Wife's Name and Succession – Advocate Manish Jha

In Shakuntala v. Robert Anthony (30 July 2026), the Supreme Court holds that property purchased in the names of the two wives devolved as each wife's own estate — Sections 35 and 38 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 governed, not Section 33.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Conviction in Appeal: Revision, Not Appeal

The Supreme Court has held that no appeal lies under Section 374 CrPC or Section 415 BNSS where a Sessions Court reverses an acquittal and convicts an accused for the first time. The remedy is criminal revision, to be examined with greater scrutiny.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

Annual Rise in Maintenance Upheld

The Delhi High Court has upheld a five per cent yearly increase built into a Family Court maintenance order, holding it a lawful means of preserving the real value of the award against inflation.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Review of Sanction Under Section 19 PC Act

A considered refusal of sanction to prosecute a public servant cannot be reopened on the same material. The Supreme Court declined to interfere with the quashing of a sanction granted after a reference from the Chief Minister's office, and imposed costs.

Read →
3 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Parity in Bail: A Delhi High Court Order

An order of 31 July 2026 illustrates three considerations that most often decide a regular bail application: the role attributed to the applicant, the position of co-accused already released, and the stage the trial has reached.

Read →
1 2 3 4 5 6 64 articles

What Is Covered Here

The chamber writes on the areas in which it appears: criminal procedure under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, bail practice, matrimonial and family proceedings before the Delhi Family Courts, cheque dishonour and recovery, and proceedings before the NCLT and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. Notes on reported judgments of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi are published with a link to the official text of the decision, so that a reader can verify the position rather than rely on a summary.

No article on this page identifies a client or discusses a pending matter conducted by the chamber. Where a statutory provision is cited, the section number is given so that a reader can verify it against the bare Act.

If a subject you need is not covered here, the chamber can be written to at legal@advocatemanishjha.com. Questions of general interest are taken up as future notes; the chamber does not give advice on individual matters by email.