Bar Council of India Notice

Disclaimer & Confirmation

As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, an advocate is not permitted to solicit work or advertise. By clicking “I Agree” below, you acknowledge and confirm that:

you are seeking information about Advocate Manish Jha of your own accord and for your own information and use; there has been no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any kind whatsoever from Advocate Manish Jha or the chamber to solicit any work through this website; the information made available here is provided only on your specific request; and no information on this website is to be construed as legal advice, nor does its use create any advocate-client relationship.

⚖  E-397, 4th Floor, Tagore Garden Extension, New Delhi – 110027 Mon–Sat  ·  +91 98738 50301  ·  legal@advocatemanishjha.com
Advocate Manish Jha Criminal · Civil · Family Law — New Delhi ☎  Consult the Chamber
Home › Articles & Updates
From the Chamber

Articles & Legal Updates

Notes on procedure and practice before the Delhi courts, written for people trying to understand a proceeding they are already in.

These notes are written for litigants and for younger members of the Bar. They explain procedure as it operates in the Delhi courts — the sequence of steps, the timelines that matter, and the points at which a matter is commonly lost. They are general information, not advice on any particular case.

All articles (867) Civil & Property (45) Commercial (1) Commercial & Corporate (204) Criminal Law (309) Cyber & Fraud (5) Matrimonial & Family (223) Procedure & Practice (80)
30 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Distress in the Witness Box Is Not Evidence of Identity: A POCSO Life Sentence Set Aside

A Division Bench of the Delhi High Court (2026:DHC:6876-DB) acquitted a man serving life under Section 6 POCSO: contradictory identification, a negative FSL report and implication through a custodial disclosure in an unrelated case left the charge unproved.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Rushing the Victim to Hospital: Post-Incident Conduct and Intention Under Section 307 IPC

In Nafe Singh v. State (2026:DHC:7091), the Delhi High Court allowed a 2004 appeal against an attempt-to-murder conviction — prompt medical help, a negative gastric lavage and a contradictory seizure record undercut the intention Section 307 requires.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Roping In the Family: The Supreme Court Quashes a False-Promise Case Against the Accused's Mother

In Ilaben v. State of Gujarat (2026 INSC 879), the Supreme Court quashed proceedings against a mother accused of connivance in her son's alleged false promise of marriage — the complainant's subsisting marriage and chat records left the allegations inspiring no confidence.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Commercial & Corporate

How Long Must You Wait? The Gap Between a Section 21 Notice and a Section 11 Petition

In Sugat Jain v. Amit Jain (2026:DHC:7161), the Delhi High Court held Section 11(6) prescribes no fixed waiting period after the arbitration notice — reasonableness depends on whether the agreed procedure has in fact failed — and appointed a sole arbitrator.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Commercial & Corporate

Purchase Preference Is Not a Passport: MSE Relaxations in Health and Safety Procurements

In Althion Tech Innovations v. Union of India (2026:DHC:6904-DB), a Division Bench upheld a ₹33 crore turnover criterion in a hemodialysis equipment tender against an MSE challenge — health and safety procurements may decline MSE relaxations, though the tender's anomaly was flagged.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Commercial & Corporate

Substance Over Arithmetic: An EMD Shortfall Does Not Void a SARFAESI Auction

In Lakshmi Mohan v. Airtech Projects (2026 INSC 909), the Supreme Court upheld a 2009 auction despite a ₹35,000 earnest money shortfall — the Rule 9(3) 25% deposit was made the same day and no prejudice resulted — while directing the bank to refund the surplus with interest.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Civil & Property

The State Cannot Take a Shortcut: Summary Eviction Fails Where a Bona Fide Title Dispute Exists

In Circar Paper Mills v. District Collector, Nellore (2026 INSC 924), the Supreme Court held that land held under registered instruments since 1920 raises a bona fide title dispute the State must prove in properly constituted proceedings — not by summary eviction.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

The One-Year Rule in Maintenance Arrears: Section 144(3) BNSS Explained

The warrant procedure for maintenance arrears, the one-year limitation on invoking it, imprisonment for wilful default and recovery strategy — the enforcement side of Section 144 BNSS (125 CrPC) explained.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

The Decree-Based Divorce Grounds: Section 13(1A) of the Hindu Marriage Act

Divorce without re-proving fault: a year of non-resumption after judicial separation, or non-compliance with a restitution decree, opens Section 13(1A) — subject always to the own-wrong check of Section 23(1)(a).

Read →
30 August 2026 · Matrimonial & Family

Her Property, Not the Family's: Stridhan and How It Is Recovered

Stridhan is the wife's absolute property. What it includes, why it is not dowry, and the three recovery routes Delhi practice uses — Section 19(8) DV Act, criminal breach of trust under Section 316 BNS, and the civil suit.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Criminal Law

No Custody, No Regular Bail: The Surrender Question in Bail Practice

Regular bail under Sections 480 and 483 BNSS presupposes arrest, appearance or surrender. What custody means, how a planned surrender works in Delhi courts, and how the choice between anticipatory and regular bail is actually made.

Read →
30 August 2026 · Criminal Law

Hearing the Other Side of Liberty: The Informant and Victim in Bail Proceedings

In specified sexual offences the BNSS makes notice to the Public Prosecutor and the informant's presence at bail hearings mandatory — and the victim's participation in bail and cancellation matters is now a settled feature of practice.

Read →
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 867 articles

What Is Covered Here

The chamber writes on the areas in which it appears: criminal procedure under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, bail practice, matrimonial and family proceedings before the Delhi Family Courts, cheque dishonour and recovery, and proceedings before the NCLT and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunals. Notes on reported judgments of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi are published with a link to the official text of the decision, so that a reader can verify the position rather than rely on a summary.

No article on this page identifies a client or discusses a pending matter conducted by the chamber. Where a statutory provision is cited, the section number is given so that a reader can verify it against the bare Act.

If a subject you need is not covered here, the chamber can be written to at legal@advocatemanishjha.com. Questions of general interest are taken up as future notes; the chamber does not give advice on individual matters by email.